Curiouser and Curiouser.

Oh wait. It’s About Money over Health Again.

There’s been a bit of a storm raging about an upcoming AVMA proposed policy against raw diets for pets, due to be voted on at their House of Delegates meeting in San Diego next week. This is, of course, the veterinary analog of the AMA. Yawn.

At first, I pretty much ignored it, as one after another of my colleagues posted about it on our homeopathic email lists. After all, what can a policy recommendation do? It has no force of law.

But, as has been pointed out, it could pave the way for legal denials of raw pet food manufacture, once a body of professionals (who must know the True Scientific Facts) takes a stand against raw feeding.

And, (not that this carries much weight in my mind) it’ll give conventional vets more grist for their “Now, Don’t Feed Raw Food!” mill. But then, most who are feeding raw are probably also not buying into the conventional recommendations like repeated vaccinations, topical poisons for flea control, internal poisons for heart worm prevention and the like.

So, why would an AVMA policy decision saying “Tsk, tsk, raw food can carry pathogenic bacteria” be of concern to someone dedicated to understanding true health and feeding appropriately wild diets? Dedicated raw feeders will always find a way.

Let’s Choose our Facts Carefully!

And it’s pretty likely the AVMA will keep their collective head in the sand about the following truth:

All the recalls of pet food over the last few years have been commercially prepared, cooked dry food and treats. NOT RAW.

Whoa. Ermm. Ahem.

And, if you want to find bacteria in raw meat, just check your local supermarket. Bring your swab and petri dish. I wrote earlier about handling the stuff carefully when you are making raw food for Spot and Puff.

Wait. A Money Trail? Ah.

But then, the plot thickened, and I feel this deeper twist must be brought to light. As is usually the case, we need only “follow the money” to find the real answers.

And boy, is there a lot of money in pet food! Think billions per year spent on it. The statistics include close to $20 billion on pet food in 2011 in the US, and roughly $24 billion for the EU. Nothing to sneeze at, eh?

So, imagine my lack of surprise when it came to light that, behind the push to come down on raw pet food is an organization who’s been against raw feeding for at least a couple of years. Who does otherwise neat things, like getting animals into hospitals to help sick people: The Delta Society.

But, here’s the money path: on the executive committee of the Delta Society is one Brenda Bax, who, <cough> is also, umm, well, just the Marketing Director of Purina. You know, that big checker boarded outfit that makes dry kibble in St. Louis and is like a household word?

Probably not in Purina’s best interest if folks are jumping ship from the contaminated kibble and heading into Awesome Raw Feeding, right?

You got it. They’ll get a bigger bite of the dog food dish if they get the AVMA to come out again those nasty raw foods out there.

 Damn Raw Food! Wait. What?

You know the foods. They make dogs’ coats shine, breath fresh, shedding stop, cure the diabetics, the inflammatory bowel disease sufferers, and take away my business. (Seriously. Raw fed pets are rarely coming to me for chronic illness. But that’s great. I don’t mind at all.)

So, if you want to add your voice to the hew and cry, there’s an open comment area at the AVMA’s blog (I know, right?). And probably a petition or two floating around if you Google those initials. I don’t have much faith that’ll do any good. Not when we’re talking a piece of a multi-billion dollar bone. But it can’t hurt, either. If you have the time and inclination, head on over.

How about you? Feeding some raw food, are you? Concerned? Let’s hear about your take in the comments.

Don’t Mess with Mother Nature!

Ever hear this one?

There’s a high white blood cell count (or fever)! This animal needs antibiotics!

This often comes from Dr. Whitecoat, and is repeated by animal owners who heard it while under conventional medical care. I maintain it’s patently false. And dangerous to accept as truth.

Let’s examine it critically.

White Blood Cells: Good Guys or Not?

The white blood cells are part of the immune system, and when they are elevated on a blood test, what does that mean? It merely means this animal is seeing the need for a good fight against some invader (barring a more rare, complicated diagnosis, like bone marrow cancer). It might be a bacteria, maybe a virus, a yeast, maybe even a chronic parasitic infestation.

Fight!

So, the fight is on! The immune system is engaged, doing what it was designed to do, to take on the invaders and stop them from taking over the body and wreaking havoc. Why would antibiotics be needed in this situation?

Antibiotics do one thing, and one thing only.

They kill bacteria, and often quite indiscriminately, the good with the “bad.”

The good bacteria are those in the lower intestinal tract, a population thought to be ten times larger than the number of cells we have that are our own!¹

These “friendly bacteria” (and fewer yeasts) are working for us, and our animals, by producing vitamins, out-competing harmful bacteria, helping immunity, and even producing beneficial hormones. It’s common knowledge that giving antibiotics kills these good species and leads to the overgrowth of yeasts in the body, the commonest being Candida species, which can lead to problems of their own.

I Got the Fever!

Fever is another part of a healthy immune response to invaders. When a fever is mounted, the body’s temperature elevates to make reproduction of pathogens more difficult.

Wait. That sounds useful, right?

You bet it is. And why would antibiotics help this battle, going on efficiently and concertedly, with the intelligence of countless years of evolution behind it?

That’s exactly what I ask, every time I hear this ILLogic.

Get Outta the Way!

Almost always we do not need to step in and “treat a high white count” or “treat a fever.” (Mom always gave me aspirin when I had one. Luckily, antibiotics weren’t so popular when I was a kid.)

Most of the time (98% probably), the incredibly well tuned vital force, that part of us all that keeps us well, is doing a great job, flexing the immune response “muscle”, killing invaders, walling them off, digesting their remains, and eliminating their toxic waste products. We just need to trust that, and let it happen.

But, I Want to Help! 

If you want to be part of the solution, to help the immune response, don’t kill the good guys in the gut or turn down the internal thermostat.

Instead, add some well studied immune support. Maybe echinacea, goldenseal, vitamin C, or my favorite, Transfer Factor. For dogs, TF Canine Complete; for cats, Feline Complete. And for kids, TF Chewable. And everyone can use TF Plus. That’s what I take, and I haven’t had a flu or cold in so long I can’t remember.

Transfer Factors both increase the immune response and balance it, far better than anything they’ve been compared to.

Do No Harm! 

Help is not indiscriminate killing of bacteria, or giving anti-fever drugs. Work with the amazing response that the immune system is waging. You’ll have a happier ending for all concerned.

¹http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_microbiome#cite_note-Sears-19

My Dog is Due for His Shots! NOT.

Really? Says who?

This is a common thing I hear, less and less from my clients who gain a deeper understanding the longer they work with me and explore and think about health in a new way, but quite common in conventional veterinary medicine.

You’ve seen them: the postcards that come, saying Spot or Puff is due for all those checked off diseases to be vaccinated against, with the date “due” prominently there.

“Make an Appointment Today!” “Don’t let your protection lapse!” “Be responsible!”

It’s worth taking a critical look at this before you leap into the car, pets in tow, for more vaccines.

Have you gotten postcards like this every year for you?

No? Why not?

Largely, it’s because you’ve been recognized to be immune from the vaccinations you had way back when you were young, and rolled up your sleeve and grimaced as the needle slid in.

Immunology has recognized this phenomenon for a great many years.
A practice that was started many years ago and that lacks scientific validity or verification is annual re-vaccinations. Almost without exception there is no immunologic requirement for annual revaccinations. Immunity to viruses persists for years or for the life of the animal.

The above quote is from Current Veterinary Therapy, volume IX, in 1992. The authors were not alternative or holistic folks, they were veterinary immunologists, widely known in that field. Here’s a link to part of the chapter, and some more efficacy information from my website.

So, why so much emphasis still on repeating vaccinations? Even in the face of major voices in vet medicine speaking out against it, including the AAHA and most veterinary schools?

Follow the money, honey. 

Who labels vaccines for yearly repetition? The manufacturers.

Based on studies showing the immunity disappears at around, say, day 364?

No, nothing of the sort.

Based on one thing, and one thing only.

$$$ 

Sell more doses, make more money. Science is not involved in this part of the label at all.

So, let’s put it this way. If your doctor said it was really in your best interests to get vaccinated every year, would you do it? What would you want to read that would convince you this was necessary? I suspect it’d be more than a label on the vial of vaccine, right?

Tell me what you think in the comments.